1999 Exit Survey

Southeast Community College

Conducted May 1999 by SECC Registrar Karin Gibson

Compiled by the Office of Institutional Planning and Research with technical assistance from Christopher Hockenberry

N of Rows in Working Data File

203

(Q1) How satisfied are you with the overall quality of instruction at SECC?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very dissatisfied

2

1.0

1.0

c satisfied

82

40.4

41.4

d very satisfied

117

57.6

99.0

e missing or n/a

2

1.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q2) How would you rate your overall experience at SECC?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very dissatisfied

2

1.0

1.0

b dissatisfied

1

.5

1.5

c satisfied

95

46.8

48.3

d very satisfied

105

51.7

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q3) How would you rate your high school preparation for college work?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very dissatisfied

17

8.4

8.4

b dissatisfied

34

16.7

25.1

c satisfied

110

54.2

79.3

d very satisfied

42

20.7

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q4) If you could start college again, would you enroll at SECC?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a definitely not

1

.5

.5

b probably not

5

2.5

3.0

c probably yes

67

33.0

36.0

d definitely yes

127

62.6

98.5

e missing or n/a

3

1.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q5) Would you recommend SECC to another student?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a definitely not

1

.5

.5

c probably yes

61

30.0

30.5

d definitely yes

137

67.5

98.0

e missing or n/a

4

2.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q6) Completed a paper or project that integrated ideas from several sources.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

b seldom

6

3.0

3.0

c occasionally

54

26.6

29.6

d often

138

68.0

97.5

e missing or n/a

5

2.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q7) Applied a concept or technique you learned in class.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

b seldom

5

2.5

2.5

c occasionally

68

33.5

36.0

d often

125

61.6

97.5

e missing or n/a

5

2.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q8) Worked on an assignment where you used a computer.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

b seldom

11

5.4

5.4

c occasionally

48

23.6

29.1

d often

142

70.0

99.0

e missing or n/a

2

1.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q9) Explained a method or theory to another person.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a never

1

.5

.5

b seldom

19

9.4

9.9

c occasionally

115

56.7

66.5

d often

66

32.5

99.0

e missing or n/a

2

1.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

 

(Q10) Participated in clubs or organizations.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a never

65

32.0

32.0

b seldom

71

35.0

67.0

c occasionally

47

23.2

90.1

d often

19

9.4

99.5

e missing or n/a

1

.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q11) Attended musical/drama activities.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a never

99

48.8

48.8

b seldom

54

26.6

75.4

c occasionally

34

16.7

92.1

d often

15

7.4

99.5

e missing or n/a

1

.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q12) How often did you use Career Placement services?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a seldom

40

19.7

19.7

b occasionally

29

14.3

34.0

c often

13

6.4

40.4

d did not use

115

56.7

97.0

e missing or n/a

6

3.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0


 

(Q13) Rate the quality of service at Career Placement services.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

6

3.0

3.0

b fair

18

8.9

11.9

c good

43

21.2

33.1

d excellent

17

8.4

41.5

e missing or n/a

119

58.6

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q14) How often did you use Counseling Services?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a seldom

32

15.8

15.8

b occasionally

48

23.6

39.4

c often

43

21.2

60.6

d did not use

77

37.9

98.5

e missing or n/a

3

1.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

 

 

(Q15) Rate the quality of service at Counseling Services.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

8

3.9

3.9

b fair

11

5.4

9.4

c good

59

29.1

38.4

d excellent

54

26.6

65.0

e missing or n/a

71

35.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q16) How often did you use Testing Services?

#

%

Cumulative %

 


missing

3

1.5

1.5

a seldom

40

19.7

21.2

b occasionally

42

20.7

41.9

c often

30

14.8

56.7

d did not use

82

40.4

97.0

e missing or n/a

6

3.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q17) Rate the quality of service at Testing Services.

#

%

Cumulative %

 


missing

2

1.0

1.0

a poor

2

1.0

2.0

b fair

15

7.4

9.4

c good

57

28.1

37.4

d excellent

41

20.2

57.6

e not applicable

86

42.4

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

 

(Q18) How often did you use the service for students with disabilities?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a seldom

23

11.3

11.3

b occasionally

9

4.4

15.8

c often

10

4.9

20.7

d did not use

153

75.4

96.1

e missing or n/a

8

3.9

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

 

 

(Q19) Rate the quality of service at Services for Students with Disabilities.

#

%

Cumulative %

 


missing

1

.5

.5

a poor

7

3.4

3.9

b fair

4

2.0

5.9

c good

23

11.3

17.2

d excellent

10

4.9

22.2

e not applicable

158

77.8

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q20) How often did you use Computing Resources?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a seldom

16

7.9

7.9

b occasionally

39

19.2

27.1

c often

114

56.2

83.3

d did not use

33

16.3

99.5

e missing or n/a

1

.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q21) Rate the quality of service at Computer Resources.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

3

1.5

1.5

b fair

22

10.8

12.3

c good

74

36.5

48.8

d excellent

81

39.9

88.7

e missing or n/a

23

11.3

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q22) How often did you use the Library?

#

%

Cumulative %

 


missing

1

.5

.5

a seldom

9

4.4

4.9

b occasionally

44

21.7

26.6

c often

129

63.5

90.1

d did not use

19

9.4

99.5

e n/a

1

.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q23) Rate the quality service at the Library.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

6

3.0

3.0

b fair

21

10.3

13.3

c good

87

42.9

56.2

d excellent

81

39.9

96.1

e not applicable

8

3.9

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q24) How often did you use the Bookstore?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a seldom

15

7.4

7.4

b occasionally

67

33.0

40.4

c often

106

52.2

92.6

d did not use

14

6.9

99.5

e missing or n/a

1

.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q25) Rate the quality of service at the Bookstore.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

15

7.4

7.4

b fair

35

17.2

24.6

c good

83

40.9

65.5

d excellent

66

32.5

98.0

e not applicable

4

2.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q26) How clear were the procedures at the Business office?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very confusing

2

1.0

1.0

b somewhat confusing

26

12.8

13.8

c clear

152

74.9

88.7

d did not use

23

11.3

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

 (Q27) Rate the quality of service at the Business office.

#

%

Cumulative %

 


1

.5

.5

a poor

8

3.9

4.4

b fair

21

10.3

14.8

c good

88

43.3

58.1

d excellent

71

35.0

93.1

e missing or n/a

14

6.9

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q28) How clear were the procedures at the Academic Dean's office?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very confusing

1

.5

.5

b somewhat confusing

14

6.9

7.4

c clear

95

46.8

54.2

d did not use

89

43.8

98.0

e missing or n/a

4

2.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q29) Rate the quality of service at the Academic Dean's office.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

missing

1

.5

.5

a poor

3

1.5

2.0

b fair

9

4.4

6.4

c good

58

28.6

35.0

d excellent

53

26.1

61.1

e missing or n/a

79

38.9

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

 

(Q30) How clear were the procedures at the Admissions office?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very confusing

2

1.0

1.0

b somewhat confusing

24

11.8

12.8

c clear

167

82.3

95.1

d did not use

10

4.9

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q31) Rate the quality of service at the Admissions office.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

2

1.0

1.0

b fair

19

9.4

10.3

c good

95

46.8

57.1

d excellent

86

42.4

99.5

e missing or n/a

1

.5

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q32) How clear were the procedures at the Registration office?

%

Cumulative %

 

a very confusing

3

1.5

1.5

b somewhat confusing

31

15.3

16.7

c clear

158

77.8

94.6

d did not use

11

5.4

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q33) Rate the quality of service at the Registration office.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

2

1.0

1.0

b fair

26

12.8

13.8

c good

94

46.3

60.1

d excellent

81

39.9

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q34) How clear were the procedures at the Financial Aid office?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very confusing

5

2.5

2.5

b somewhat confusing

24

11.8

14.3

c clear

136

67.0

81.3

d did not use

36

17.7

99.0

e missing or n/a

2

1.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q35) Rate the quality of services at the Financial Aid office.

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a poor

2

1.0

1.0

b fair

15

7.4

8.4

c good

67

33.0

41.4

d excellent

90

44.3

85.7

e not applicable

29

14.3

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

  

(Q36) How clear were the Campus Security procedures?

#

%

Cumulative %

 

a very confusing

3

1.5

1.5

b somewhat confusing

9

4.4

5.9

c clear

68

33.5

39.4

d did not use

117

57.6

97.0

e missing or n/a

6

3.0

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q37) Rate the quality of Campus Security.

#

%

Cumulative %

 


1

.5

.5

a poor

5

2.5

3.0

b fair

12

5.9

8.9

c good

40

19.7

28.6

d excellent

34

16.7

45.3

e missing or n/a

111

54.7

100.0

Total

203

100.0

 

(Q38) To what degree has your SECC education added to your practical skills necessary to obtain employment in your field.

#

%

Cumulative %