ALUMNI SURVEY:


  • Transfer Students
  • Nursing Students
  • Respiratory Care Students
  • Radiologic Technology Students
  • Clinical Laboratory Technology Students



    • ALUMNI SURVEY OF SECC 2000 GRADUATES - TRANSFER
    Conducted July-Sept. 2001 by SECC Office of Institutional Planning and Research

    Are you currently attending a college/university?

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid yes 36 87.8 87.8 87.8
    no 5 12.2 12.2 100.0
    Total 41 100.0 100.0

    What is your present standing at that college/university?

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Freshman 1 2.4 2.8 2.8
    Sophomore 1 2.4 2.8 5.6
    Junior 5 12.2 13.9 19.4
    Senior 29 70.7 80.6 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    Are you a full time or part time student?

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Full time student 34 82.9 94.4 94.4
    Part time student 2 4.9 5.6 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    Excluding remedial and technical courses not intended to transfer, did all of your course work transfer?

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Yes 32 78.0 88.9 88.9
    No 4 9.8 11.1 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    Academically, I was well prepared for transfer.

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Strongly Agree 18 43.9 50.0 50.0
    Agree 17 41.5 47.2 97.2
    Neutral 1 2.4 2.8 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    I was well prepared to accomplish most writing assignments.

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Strongly Agree 18 43.9 50.0 50.0
    Agree 16 39.0 44.4 94.4
    Neutral 1 2.4 2.8 97.2
    Disagree 1 2.4 2.8 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    I was well prepared to accomplish most reading assignments.

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Strongly Agree 18 43.9 50.0 50.0
    Agree 13 31.7 36.1 86.1
    Neutral 1 2.4 2.8 88.9
    Disagree 1 2.4 2.8 91.7
    Strongly Disagree 3 7.3 8.3 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    I was well prepared to accomplish most mathematical assignments.

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Strongly Agree 19 46.3 52.8 52.8
    Agree 6 14.6 16.7 69.4
    Neutral 11 26.8 30.6 100.0
    Total 36 87.8 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    When do you expect to graduate from this college or university?

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid 2001-2002 30 73.2 90.9 90.9
    2002-2003 2 4.9 6.1 97.0
    2003-2004 1 2.4 3.0 100.0
    Total 33 80.5 100.0
    Missing System 8 19.5

    Total 41 100.0


    If you had to start your college education over, would you choose Southeast Community College?

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Yes 36 87.8 100.0 100.0
    Missing System 5 12.2

    Total 41 100.0


    ALUMNI SURVEY OF SECC 2000 GRADUATES - NURSING
    Conducted July-Sept. 2001 by SECC Office of Institutional Planning & Research
    Survey respondents were asked to rate their level of preparation and training for thirteen skills:
    Assessment placement

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
    Excellent 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Analysis processes

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
    Excellent 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Planning processes

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
    Excellent 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Implementing processes

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 10.0 10.0 10.0
    Excellent 27 90.0 90.0 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Evaluation process

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 10.0 10.0 10.0
    Excellent 27 90.0 90.0 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Caring of group of patients/clients

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
    Excellent 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with patients/clients

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
    Good 10 33.3 33.3 36.7
    Excellent 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with families

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
    Good 19 63.3 63.3 66.7
    Excellent 10 33.3 33.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with physicians

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 19 63.3 63.3 63.3
    Good 6 20.0 20.0 83.3
    Excellent 5 16.7 16.7 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with nurse supervisor

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
    Good 15 50.0 50.0 53.3
    Excellent 14 46.7 46.7 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with nurse peers

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 16 53.3 53.3 53.3
    Excellent 14 46.7 46.7 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with other nurse staff

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
    Good 10 33.3 33.3 36.7
    Excellent 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Interaction with other non nursing staff

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 9 30.0 30.0 30.0
    Good 8 26.7 26.7 56.7
    Excellent 13 43.3 43.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0
    ALUMNI SURVEY OF SECC 2000 GRADUATES - RESPIRATORY CARE
    Conducted July-Sept. 2001 by SECC Office of Institutional Planning and Research

    Survey respondents were asked to rate their level of preparation and training for seventeen skills:
    Pulmonary function testing

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good` 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Arterial puncture and blood gas analysis

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    EKG
    EKG

    		Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Oximetry, transcutaneous monitoring

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Chest x-ray assessment
    Chest x-ray assessment

    		Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
    Excellent 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
    Total 5 100.0 100.0

    Hemodynamic monitoring

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
    Excellent 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
    Total 5 100.0 100.0

    Chest physical assesment

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Determination of appropriateness of therapy

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Airway management

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Bronchian hygiene

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Mechanical Ventilation

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Therapeutic gas administration

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Quality control of respiratory care equipment

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
    Excellent 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
    Total 5 100.0 100.0

    Troubleshooting respiratory care equipment

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Patient education

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Time management

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Supervision of others

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

    ALUMNI SURVEY OF SECC 2000 GRADUATES - RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY
    Conducted July-Sept. 2001 by SECC Office of Institutional Planning and Research

    Survey respondents were asked to rate their level of preparation and training for thirteen skills:
    Positioning adult patients

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Positioning pediatric patients

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Recognizing and respon to life threatening conditions

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Providing patient education

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Poor 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Fair 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Providing patient's care/comfort

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 2 66.7 66.7 66.7
    Good 1 33.3 33.3 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Operating medical imaging equipment (tube, table, etc.)

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Recognizing safety limits/procedures

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Recognizing and reporting malfunctions

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Poor 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Practing radiation protection for self

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Evaluating medical images for technical quality

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Evaluating medical images for anatomical structures

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Performing quality control procedures

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 3 100.0 100.0 100.0
    ALUMNI SURVEY OF SECC 2000 GRADUATES - CLINICAL LABORATORY TECH
    Conducted July-Sept. 2001 by SECC Office of Institutional Planning and Research

    Survey respondents were asked to rate their level of preparation and training for twenty-six skills:
    Collection of venous blood

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Collection of capillary blood

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 2 66.7 66.7 66.7
    Excellent 1 33.3 33.3 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Pipetting

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Laboratory calculations

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Physical examination

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Chemical examination

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Microscopic examination

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Body fluids analysis

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Manual cell counting

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Operation of cell counting

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 2 66.7 66.7 66.7
    Excellent 1 33.3 33.3 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Differential blood cell counting and evaluation

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Excellent 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Coalgulation testing

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Operation of automated systems in clinical chemistry

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Fair 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Good 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Performance of manual chemical tests

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Performance of routine serological tests

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Disposal of contaiminated material

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Reading of Gram stains

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Reading of other differential stains

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Selection of media for specific specimen types

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 2 66.7 66.7 66.7
    Excellent 1 33.3 33.3 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Identification of unknown bacteria

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Excellent 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Identification of unknown mycological agents

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Excellent 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Identification of unknown parasites

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 1 33.3 33.3 33.3
    Excellent 2 66.7 66.7 100.0
    Total 3 100.0 100.0

    Performance of anti-microbial susceptibility tests

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Typing of blood

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Excellent 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Identification of irregular antibodies

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Cross matching bloods

    		 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
    Valid Good 3 100.0 100.0 100.0